Quantcast
Channel: Thulean Perspective »Ôðalism

The Thulean Perspective

$
0
0

EspañolFrançais. MagyarРусскийСрпски.

After some reading of comments and some contemplation I think the best thing to do is to state that the philosophy, religion, ideology, life stance, tradition, world view and spirituality expressed by me on this blog will henceforth be described as Ôðalism (Odalism). You will only find most of these interpretations of the European Paganism available for free here on this blog; if you find them elsewhere the person responsible must have used this blog or SRAS as a source (which of course is perfectly fine). Naturally this does not apply to everything in this blog, but it does apply to everything related to Paganism that is not commonly found in books (other than SRAS). Like this and this. If in doubt regarding the truthfulness of what I say here, I will encourage you to search through every single book out there, and every archive, online or physical, and see if you can find evidence of the opposite. You will not.

The reason why I state this, and make such a big point of it, is that I wish to define these interpretations and views clearly as Ôðalic and as a part of Ôðalism (pronounced «Othalism», with a th as in English that) and/or Ôþalism (pronounced «Othalism», with the th as in English thing).

You can agree with my interpretations or you can disagree, or you can wait and see before you make up your mind, but if you do agree your version of Paganism can then be defined as Ôðalism (Odalism).

Ôðalism is not just nationalism, not just Pagan religion, not just ideology, not just spirituality, not just environmentalism, not just philosophy, not just militarism, not just true democracy, not just a tradition; it is everything of the aforementioned – and this makes it’s meaning distinctly different from the meaning of any single one of the terms above.

My ambition with this is to by means of mere reasoning and by showing the truth enlist other Europeans to Ôðalism as a political-spiritual-religion fueling a real liberation movement in Europe. With this, and I think only with this, can we banish the Judeo-Christian darkness from Europe for good and turn our beloved continent into a true Europe again.

Any spark can turn dry wood into a fire, but we have not only a spark, but the very embers of our forebears, still glowing under the ashes of Europe. All we need is to add some dry twigs and branches, and they will turn into the wild, raging, roaring European fire they came from. With this fire we can warm and light up Europe again, and turn her into what she can and should be – and we can banish the Judeo-Christian darkness for good. This is only the beginning. HailaR WôðanaR!



Human & Animal Sacrifices

$
0
0

FrenchMagyarSerbian.

As a Pagan I constantly hear from the enemies of Paganism that the Pagans used to sacrifice humans to their gods. There is evidence they indeed did so, but those who present this evidence to us in books, or talk about this on TV documentaries and such, are not only most often Judeo-Christians, but of course always modern human beings. They see human sacrifice as an abomination, a horrible and utterly primitive religious practice from a distant past, that they “of course” are ashamed of, often on behalf of peoples and races that they not even belong to themselves.

Naturally, I am of another opinion…

Forseti_zu_Gericht_sitzend

Yes, you see, the gods and goddesses of Europe were present on Earth, also as real physical beings: the best men and women, boys and girls, impersonated them, became them and thus were them on Earth. When an individual in a society committed a crime, he had to stand trial in front of his gods, here on Earth. Most of the time he would be asked to pay fines – to repair the damage he had caused. Some times he was outlawed, usually for one year and a day – to give him a chance to improve, and to also protect the society from his darkness until he had. To the (in their eyes) more serious crimes such as murder (i. e. a dishonourable killing), horse theft, cowardice, homosexuality, adultery, and also repeating minor offenses (sort of like “three strikes out”) would result in a death sentence, though. The idea was that: “one bad apple spoils the barrel, so when we find one we need to get rid of it before it is to late.”

The gods were the judges, here on Earth, convicting the criminals, and therefore their priests or priestesses were responsible for carrying out the executions – in form of what we today describe as a human sacrifice – to the gods. So they didn’t just “sacrifice” people randomly to their deities. They were in fact just execution criminals judged (by the gods themselves!) unfit for life.

So what they did was pretty much exactly the same as many societies still do today, including the hard-core Judeo-Christian USA: they executed criminals…

The Pagan justice system was interwoven with the religion itself. There was no distinction between worldly and spiritual/religious power, no separate “state” and “church”. The kings and judges were also the gods. Therefore the executions of criminals where carried out as human sacrifices to the gods.

***

As a Pagan I constantly hear from the enemies of Paganism that the Pagans used to sacrifice animals to their gods. They slaughtered the animals on their altars, and then ate them, and gave parts of the sacrificed animals to the gods themselves – or to their temples.

We do the same today, only on an industrial scale, and without offering anything to anybody, save to those who can pay for the product… after we have pumped water into it, so that it is more heavy (you pay by the pound, right!?), and after we have sprayed all sorts of more or less poisonous chemicals on it, for all sorts of mad reasons.

Our forebears had more closeness to nature and the animals they ate. They had the idea that they should think a bit before they killed an animal, and then offer parts of the animal back to the deity they belonged to, in gratitude to the animal giving its life so that man could eat. The deity was naturally a man or woman, boy or girl, impersonating the deity on Earth. Naturally they too had to eat, and they didn’t get any food from working as gods or goddesses in some temple, and nor did their priests and priestesses. Just like Buddhist monks today, they were depending on food gifts from people to survive. And therefore people sacrificed animals to their gods… so that everybody could eat well, thrive and live.

***

There is no reason to complicate what or forebears did, and try to make “sacrifices” and “rituals” and “ceremonies” sound so bad. There is no reason to think sharing is bad: take some for yourself, and give some to the deities – those most wonderful and most beautiful individuals amongst us, who work for us, for our interests, as our kings and queens, gods and goddesses, and judges too, and who were selected for this task because they were the best suited. Sacrifice to them what you can afford, and not what some state tells you to, in percentage of your income….

Frigg_als_Ostara


From whence I came

$
0
0

BulgarianFrenchMagyarSerbian.
It has been said before, on this blog, that our forebears were better than us. Or if you like: that we were better in long forgotten previous lives. It has also been said, on this blog, that Judeo-Christianity is the main reason for this fall. It is not the only reason, though, and you might well argue that the mixing of species that occurred long before Antiquity is in fact an even more important reason for our fall. And you might well be right if you do. The mixing of species ruined us, stripped us of our natural defenses, and then Judeo-Christianity crept into our broken world like a worm, finishing us off with it’s poison– turning us into feeble, coward, useless, worthless and ugly shadows of what we once was.

Naturally reality is more complicated than that, and there are so many factors that have contributed to our fall. The worst is perhaps the factors that made us turn everything on it’s head: the deepest and darkest wells became the tallest and fairest towers; the foulest trolls became the most beautiful elves; the dearest brothers became the most hated enemies; and the vilest laziness became the greatness of mankind! ‘Harmony’ turned into ‘civilization’. ‘Survival of the fittest’ turned into ‘survival of the laziest’.

Aye, this is what happened: man began to invent not because he was brilliant, because he was creative or because he had great visions! No! He began to invent because he was lazy, because he no longer coped with his situation, and because he was left behind in the natural race. He became a failed hunter, so he needed better hunting tools and hunting techniques. He became a bad navigator, so he needed tools to assist him in that context too. He became worse at everything, because of the mixing of species.

With time – as the European man continued to fall – he kept inventing things, that were to make life easier for him – and easier and easier. And the more he invented, the less he himself needed to be of any quality whatsoever to survive, so he just fell faster and faster, as time went by. The once skilled, brave and happy hunter-gatherer became a fat, burger-eating, TV-watching subhuman, so lazy he needed a car to even bother picking up the mail 50 yards from his front door. With time he will become so degenerate that he is no longer able to reproduce at all, even with the help of modern medicine, and then mankind on this planet will cease to exist.

Aye, this is the fruits of civilization. This is the inevitable end of the ‘civilized’ man, unless of course technology ends us before that happens. And yet we celebrate this darkest and deepest well as the fairest and tallest of towers…. We are proud of what we have created! Fools amongst us even use it to prove our (European) superiority to others.

My wife has suggested several times, that what we create today is just replacements for abilities that we had before. Before the mixing of species we didn’t need any of it: not computers, not star maps, not compasses, certainly not cars, not cameras, not electricity. Not anything modern. We could sense directions, just like many animals can. We could photograph with our minds. We could store immense ammounts of data in our brains. Etc. The mixing if species left us with an emptiness, a void inside us, that we since then tried to fill with…. all this technology, and not least with art. So we remember a harmony that we can no longer achieve. We try to, over and over again, but we are not able to. So no matter what we do, we end up disappointed. There is no ‘salvation’. There is no escape. There is no solution. We just don’t have what we need to achieve what we want: what we had before we mixed.

So we degenerate. So we accelerate our own destruction, with more and more technology, with more and more mixing of species and races. The European man commits suicide… and the other species and races will be dragged down into the abyss with him – no matter what they do. They have been in the same boat for quite some time already. Mankind is doomed!

Ah, well. What can one say but ‘good riddance’? I shed no tears for people running willingly into their own doom. I will encourage them to do so, as soon as possible. “Run you pigs, run right into the slaughter house!” See if I care. We are better off without them. The entire planet Earth is better off without them. *spit*

lemmings-at-the-cliff

You see, ‘mankind’ is an interesting entity. It is in no need of 7 or 8 billion human beings to exist, to survive and thrive. In fact, it survived and thrived much better in the past, when it was made up of maybe only 100,000 human beings in all – all over the planet. It is still ‘mankind’. If 99.99% of today’s ‘mankind’ jumps off a cliff and dies, ‘mankind’ will probably be much better off tomorrow… because those who didn’t jump off that cliff will not only pose less of a threat to the harmony of this planet, but will probably also be made up of those who wanted to live, who wanted not to cultivate laziness, stupidity and degeneration. Those who didn’t jump off that cliff would probably still not achieve harmony with anything at all, but they would have the wisdom to think that: “If we do the right thing, if we cultivate only the strong, beautiful, the healthy and natural man, then one day we will”.

Most human beings today do jump off that cliff. They follow the herd into the abyss, into their own doom, thinking nothing thereupon. As an Ôðalist I will instead start the long and hard walk back to Harmony; on overgrown paths, through thickset forests and brushwood, life after life after life, until I one day will finally have returned to the place from whence I came. Purified. Improved. Restored.

HailaR WôðanaR!

Saxon1


The Dark Ages

$
0
0

FrenchMagyarRomanian. Serbian. Spanish.
The Dark Ages is a term used to describe the period between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance. It is called by that name because “The period is characterized by a relative scarcity of historical and other written records at least for some areas of Europe, rendering it obscure to historians”. We can also read that: “The concept of a Dark Age originated with the Italian scholar Petrarch (Francesco Petrarca) in the 1330s, and was originally intended as a sweeping criticism of the character of Late Latin literature. Petrarch regarded the post-Roman centuries as “dark” compared to the light of classical antiquity. Later historians expanded the term to refer to the transitional period between Roman times and the High Middle Ages (c. 11th–13th century), including the lack of Latin literature, and a lack of contemporary written history, general demographic decline, limited building activity and material cultural achievements in general. Later historians and writers picked up the concept, and popular culture has further expanded on it as a vehicle to depict the Middle Ages as a time of backwardness, extending its pejorative use and expanding its scope.

As we know, the fall of Rome came shortly after the introduction of Judeo-Christianity as the official cult, and we also know that the Renaissance was a renaissance of the ‘Pagan’ (i. e. European) culture, ideals, philosophy, science and values, that by the 14th century had began to return to Europe from the Muslim world via crusaders and Muslim invaders. Unlike the Judeo-Christians, who burned and destroyed everything European they came across, the Muslims had kept the European literature they came across.

The early Dark Ages are described as “The Migration Period”, when different European tribes moved about: first Huns and Goths, Vandals, Saxons, Jutes and Angles and other Germanic tribes, then Slavs and others too. They were – according to history – forced to move by other tribes. History don’t say much about why this migration period came about in the first place though, why the first tribes started to migrate, pushing others to do the same. We do however know why the Scandinavians started to move about in the Viking Age, and we know that they were not forced to move by other migrating tribes: they started to move about because of the aggression of Judeo-Christians in the south. Yes, interestingly, the “moving about” of tribes correspond well only with the spread of Judeo-Christianity in Europe… After Southern Europe had been Christianized, the spread of Judeo-Christianity came first to Western Europe, then to Eastern Europe, then finally to Northern Europe. And wherever it came the tribes started to ‘migrate’.

Rather than tell us what happened in this time of “demographic decline”, historians today just – safely – state that “we don’t know”. It’s a Dark Age….

That is of course very convenient for the Judeo-Christians, whose historians basically say that: “Judeo-Christianity rose in the Roman Empire in spite of the cruel and unjust persecution by the emperors, then the Roman Empire fell (because of pressure from “barbarians”, must say: not because of the disruptive, criminal and destructive work of Judeo-Christians inside the Roman Empire….) and after a few hundred years of historical darkness, that we don’t know much about, most of Europe emerged Judeo-Christian.”

We have written sources describing how the Romans, the Scandinavians, the Balts and the Finns resisted the Christianization violently, but conveniently we have no sources describing how the other Europeans reacted (but we are told to believe that the other European tribes were simply converted….because the message of “Jesus” is so true and convincing, of course). We just know that they started to “migrate” and that there was “demographic decline” in Europe at the time. And then when history was being recorded again they were all Judeo-Christians. Hallelujah!

*sigh*

***

Let me tell you what I think happened: the Judeo-Christians destroyed the Roman Empire from within, and whilst doing so the “barbarian” peoples of Europe defended themselves, from the Judeo-Christian poison coming from the Roman Empire, by attacking the Roman Empire – just like the Scandinavians defended themselves from the same poison a few hundred years later, in the Viking Age, by attacking mainly the Judeo-Christian missionary centers (i. e. monasteries) in Judeo-Christian Europe.

The conversion of Europeans was – as described in the later Scandinavian Viking Age sources – by means of threats, violence, torture, hostage taking, child abduction and murder. The Judeo-Christians operated the most ruthless, violent and cruel mafias, with the Pope and the Great Patriarch as the godfathers, and gained power in the same manner as criminal organisations today gain power.

This caused entire tribes to migrate, to flee from their terror, in an attempt to get away from them. So the Saxons, the Jutes, the Angles, the Belgae etc. fled to Pagan lands, the British Isles. Others charged head on, and sacked Rome (again…). Yet others moved entirely out of Europe, like the Vandals.

When the Judeo-Christian sicarii-like mob came to Scandinavia, just before the Viking Age, this was the reason for the sudden ‘Viking’ activity, and only then came ‘The Viking Age”, and many there too fled, to Ireland, to Scotland, to Iceland and even to the Americas, where the Judeo-Christians were weak or where they had no power at all, or they charged head on and sacked the monasteries from whence the terrorists came, and cut them down like the genocidal criminals they were.

Yes, I think the ‘demographic decline’ in Europe from year 400 to 800 was the result of a genocide perpetrated by the Judeo-Christians. They were terrorizing and killing Europeans en masse, men and women, young and old, boys and girls, and even infants – and we don’t know about this because they covered up their crime by – conveniently – erasing 400 years of written history. And they could do that: they wrote this history themselves, they kept the books themselves, in their monasteries. Getting rid of these books was no problem. So they did (and they still do the same, even to the events we have experienced in our own age: they erase or re-write history as they see fit).

To us it’s just a dark age, that we “know nothing about”, and then we are supposed to believe that Europe accepted Judeo-Christianity willingly, without resistance. The Viking Age is written off as the fruits of Scandinavian “barbarism” and “Pagan aggression”, and the Roman resistance was just absurd, and only a result of ignorance. “They even accused the Judeo-Christians of cannibalism, ha ha ha”. How ridicules. Right?

***

The hard facts are that Europe after the Christianization and before the Renaissance is referred to by modern scientists (including archaeologists) like this: “general demographic decline, limited building activity and material cultural achievements in general.” These are the fruits of Judeo-Christianity. Europe before Judeo-Christianity was prosperous, scientifically advanced, educated, healthy, spiritually advanced, culturally advanced and artistically advanced, and all of this did only return to Europe with the Renaissance, the beginning of the end of Judeo-Christianity in Europe, when Europe started to find back to its own roots. Europe started the long walk back to life, after having suffered in the Judeo-Christian darkness for so long.

Judeo-Christian art from the Dark Ages:

220px-L'abbé_Ména_et_le_Christ_01Mosaik-Ikone_Christus_der_Barmherzige

European art from before the Christianization:

800px-Ceinture_en_or_MAN 742px-Gold_torque_1 470px-Parade_helmet 800px-Britishmuseumsnettishamgreattorchellenistic-artZeus_pompeiOseberg_Wagon

European art from after the Renaissance

the-birth-of-venus-1485(1)

Botticelli-primavera

Chateau-d-Anet-Fontaine-de-Diane

Pre-Judeo-Christian European art intentionally destroyed and desecrated (with crosses) by Judeo-Christians during the Christianization: 

venusdm livinia germanicus augustus aphrodite

We are still walking, or rather climbing uphill, back to Olympus, so to speak. We still struggle to get rid of the darkness, but we prevail: every day we live we prevail over their darkness. We have found the light of our forebears, and no amount of Judeo-Christian darkness can extinguish that light.

Finally, I will add a note on how to destroy Judeo-Christianity in Europe, and remove it from our soil, lock stock and barrel: we just have to inform our young about the nature and origin of Judeo-Christianity, and raise them as good Europeans instead. No informed, sane, well-fed, healthy and free human being will ever convert or has ever converted to Judeo-Christianity!

Forget about the old: they are lost to brainwash and shame and are soon dead anyhow, from old age, but we must make sure that they take their perverse foreign cult with them when they die. Judeo-Christianity can in theory be completely removed from Europe in only one single generation! So let us do so! If we do all our other problems will go away too, because Judeo-Christianity is the root to just about all our problems today!

Hail the European tribes still alive!

XXX

A Judeo-Christian image showing how they treated the European art and culture:

frikolaos2

 


Real Deities

$
0
0

Bulgarian. MagyarSerbian. Spanish.

As explained here, our forebears didn’t believe in “gods” as we today often understand the term. The term “god” in English is an Anglo-Saxon term, and the original meaning is simply “good”, “good thing”, “good deed”, “benefit”, “goodness” or “welfare”. The good and beneficial spirits of nature were hailed as “gods”, and the harmful and some times even malevolent spirits of nature were naturally not.

The European deities were (and still are) ideals, positive concepts such as “the spirit of honesty” or “the spirit of justice”, and unless impersonated by men or women, actors playing the role of certain gods or goddesses, these deities naturally never answered the prayers of men. So there was no pathological relationship between the Pagan European and his deities. He was not at all relating to his deities like the Judeo-Christians do in relation to their “god”. He did not hear voices, “the voice of god”, when there were in fact nobody speaking to him. He did not expect nothing to produce something. He did not address nothing.

Who is this guy talking to?

Jesus-Christ-Praying-Wallpapers-10

His sacrifices were to real deities; he gave something to his deity and then got something in return. His prayers were addressed to real deities; he asked for something, negotiated with his deity, and then they agreed on something. He could see and touch and communicate with his deities: the deities were real! The deities were impersonated by men and women of flesh and blood. The deities were kept forever young, immortal, by the yearly selections.

This was the case in Ancient Greece, Ancient Scandinavia, Ancient Gaul, Ancient Britannia, Ancient Egypt, Ancient Persia etc., wherever men of European stock dwelled.

A very much real deity

Zeus_pompei

The spirits of nature are very much real too, and they are called spirits because they are not physicals. They are what we would call ideals: honesty, courage, justice, health, beauty, purity, innocence, kindness, love, etc. These ideals – spirits – were seen everywhere in nature. A particularly courageous animal would be an animal linked to the spirit of courage, a particularly kind animal would be an animal linked to the spirit of kindness, a particular strong tree would be a tree linked to the god of strength, etc. You an always argue that “there are no spirits”, but you would be as wrongs as if you argued that there is no honesty, courage, justice, health, beauty, purity, innocence, kindness, love, etc-

Two more real deities

bragi_741935358

The European deities were thus very much real.  


About European Morals

$
0
0

BulgarianFrenchSerbian.

One thing that is rather odd, is that Christians seems to think that they have some sort of monopoly on morals and good behaviour, that the Europeans before the Christianisation were just a bunch of amoral lunatics, raping, killing, pillaging, drinking and having no moral attitudes or self discipline whatsoever. They are often Christians because they are good and moral themselves (they are Europeans in blood after all), and wrongly believe that they need to take the consequence of that and therefore become or remain Christians. They know no other good and moral alternative.

images (17)

Many modern so-called Pagans seems to think the same, and mistake Heathendom with Hedonism, and use their cartoonish mock-Paganism as an excuse to be amoral and live what the Christians would call ‘a life in sin’ – and what a real Pagan would call ‘a life without Honour’.

Well, I have no problems with what is perceived as traditional ‘Christian’ values and morals: loyalty, family values, kindness, honesty, self discipline (or ‘moderation’) etc.. But let me be perfectly clear: these are not ‘Christian’ values! These are values the Christians adopted from Paganism – or rather keptwhen they were Christianized. You can even argue that these are values they kept in spite of the Christianisation: these are the European values the Judeo-Christians failed to eradicate, when they created the Christian cult to destroy Rome (and later the rest of Europe).

As a Pagan European I am not the opposite of Christian Europeans. My problem with them is not their morals, but their embrace of an international and racist religion bent on mixing all races and destroying all cultures and religions on this planet – and replace them all with just ‘Christians’ (of any race or any mix) and Judeo-Christian culture. They have done their best to destroy our European culture for more than a thousand years, and they still try to complete this task.

When you meet Europeans who identify themselves as ‘Christians’, remember this: they don’t need Christianity to justify being moral. The exact same good values and morals are embraced in our European religion too. Paganism is not a excuse to sleep around, drink, take drugs or in other ways behave like a complete idiot. Paganism is the foundation on which all good traditions and morals stand! And unlike Christianity, Paganism is without dangerous alien influence, or even alien control, from some non-European tribe not at all friendly towards Europe and European culture. And unlike Christianity, Paganism is friendly towards all other non-aggressive and non-expansionist religions and cultures on this planet, and seek not to destroy them and replace them with the worship of one non-European tribe and their self-proclaimed right to destroy and enslave all others.

All Christian Europeans who seriously want to ensure the survival of Europe as a biological entity should open their eyes to this, cast the anti-European and racist Christianity aside like a wet towel, and become real Europeans again. Only a Pagan European is ‘a European mind in a European body’. 

Related post here and here.

Hail the European Gods! Hail and Joy!

Runes

“In hoc signo vinces” 


Into the Shades…

$
0
0

FrenchSerbian.

Some time ago I made a post here in support of the by Kevin S. newly formed ‘White Shade Society’ (WSS), because I was told that WSS was supposed to be a forum built around the Thulean Perspective community.

The other day I dropped by, because I received so many complaints from fellow European Óðalists, and saw this on the home page of WSS: “Welcome to White Shade Society, a pro-life/pro-right-to-die Christian/Pagan/Atheist et al, health and human rights community”. So WSS is not built around the TP community, but is instead a site for pretty much anybody (except for those who happen to live in South America [they are all banned from WSS, because they live in South America]) and WSS even promotes Christianity! That is about as far from the Thulean Perspective community as you can get.

I wanted to support a forum for those who share at least most of the opinions expressed on Thulean Perspective, but instead Kevin turned it (or allowed it to be turned) – after I had given him my support – into a forum for Christians as well, and apparently (if we are to trust the many mails I have received) even a forum where Christians and Christianity is under special protection and is given special rights to attack our own European culture (Paganism).

So, just like I wrote a post in support of WSS, I will now write a post retracting my support. I have asked Kevin to remove my profile on WSS, and he kindly did, and I will encourage everybody else to do the same. WSS is with the embrace of Christianity and Christians an anti-Óðálism forum, and I don’t think Kevin understands what Óðalism is. He and all others who are in doubt should read these posts:

See here: WHY ODALISM

And here: WHY THE EUROPAN RELIGION

I can add that I have tried to reason with Kevin, but he doesn’t seem to understand the problem, and he even refuses to answer simple questions.

Christians represent a religion that has since it’s start as a sect in Judea, been responsible for almost a total destruction of Europe. Christians are enemies of Europe and everything European, and you have to understand that and take the consequences of that. See here: ABOUT APOLOGISTS

Related: THE DARK AGES

Thank you for the attention,

HailaR WôðanaR!


Blindest is He who does not want to see

$
0
0

Serbian.
Not often do I write, and no longer do I write with the candidness that I used to – and I don’t because it no longer serves any purpose to do so. What I used to say in the past, many others say today. I am no longer one of few. The world does not need me to say the same anymore. The relay baton has passed from me to others.

So rather than write, rather than play music or sing; I try to free myself from the sticky claws of civilization. As we all know by now, civilization is failing and falling, and those who cling to it will fail and fall with it. I think ahead and try to live now how I will be forced to live in the future.

A shadow spreads out across our world; black clouds gather in the sky; a new darkness rises, but rather than curse the darkness, we must light a candle, and get through it – until the next sunrise. Those who make it will be purified; cleansed; improved. Better.

Our future world will be different. Thankfully.

Our Pagan Past, a Golden Age:

solhverv





<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>